The Non-thermal GN 1/2 tray WAS DE1237012150 is compared with similar gastronorm containers in the GN 1/2 format from the brand WAS. All compared products share standardized GN 1/2 dimensions for seamless integration into professional kitchen equipment, but they vary in depth, perforation, material, and specific purpose. The primary differences lie in storage capacity, drainage capabilities, and material choices between stainless steel and melamine.
⚙️ The technical specifications comparison covers the footprint, depth or height, material composition, structural design, and practical purpose of each container.
| Parameter | Non-thermal GN 1/2 tray WAS DE1237012150 | Food tray WAS GN 1/2 DE1237012040 | Perforated GN 1/2 stainless steel tray WAS | Food container WAS GN 1/2 DE1236512065 | Stainless steel GN 1/2 container WAS DE1237012200 | Tray WAS GN 1/2 Black Melamine DE1236705112 | Practical conclusion |
|---|
| Footprint | GN 1/2 | GN 1/2 | GN 1/2 | GN 1/2 | GN 1/2 | GN 1/2 | All products are fully compatible with standard GN 1/2 systems and equipment. |
| Depth / Height | 150 mm | 40 mm | 150 mm (usable) | 65 mm | 200 mm | Standard GN 1/2 depth | The WAS DE1237012150 offers a balanced 150 mm depth for large storage capacity, trailing the 200 mm deep model while outperforming shallower trays. |
| Material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel | Stainless steel | White melamine | Stainless steel (chromium-nickel) | Black melamine | Stainless steel is suited for intensive storage and cooling, whereas melamine focuses on food presentation. |
| Construction | Solid, non-thermal | Solid, non-thermal | Perforated | Solid | Solid, deep | Solid, rigid | The WAS DE1237012150 is a versatile solid container, unlike the perforated drainage alternative. |
| Purpose | Storage, prep, and service | Storage, portioning, display | Drainage, air circulation, steaming | Storage and buffet presentation | General preparation and storage | Serving, presenting, and holding | The choice depends on whether deep food storage or aesthetic buffet presentation is required. |
◎ The use case comparison helps identify which model is best suited for specific professional kitchen, buffet, or counter requirements.
| Use case | Recommended product | Why |
|---|
| Deep storage of prep ingredients and bulk goods | Non-thermal GN 1/2 tray WAS DE1237012150 | The 150 mm height provides substantial capacity for storing ingredients and organizing workstation layouts. |
| Shallow portioning and display counters | Food tray WAS GN 1/2 DE1237012040 | The 40 mm depth is optimal for short-term storage and showcasing smaller food portions. |
| Washing, rinsing, and draining food | Perforated GN 1/2 stainless steel tray WAS | Perforations allow efficient liquid drainage and optimal air circulation. |
| Visual food presentation on a white background | Food container WAS GN 1/2 DE1236512065 | White melamine is lightweight, hygienic, and ideal for buffet table aesthetics. |
| Maximum storage volume | Stainless steel GN 1/2 container WAS DE1237012200 | The 200 mm depth delivers the largest volume capacity among the steel alternatives. |
| Stylish serving on a dark background | Tray WAS GN 1/2 Black Melamine DE1236705112 | Black melamine provides a contrasting and elegant appearance for presenting finished dishes. |
The Non-thermal GN 1/2 tray WAS DE1237012150 differs from alternatives through its optimal 150 mm depth and durable stainless steel construction, making it an ideal choice for professional kitchens requiring reliable storage and organization of moderate-to-large ingredient volumes. A buyer should prefer this option if a versatile steel container with strong capacity for refrigerators and worktops is needed, whereas melamine is better suited for tabletop presentation and the perforated model for draining.
